Federal | State | Appellate | Trial
Alabama | Illinois | Montana | Rhode Island |
Alaska | Indiana | Nebraska | South Carolina |
Arizona | Iowa | Nevada | South Dakota |
Arkansas | Kansas | New Hampshire | Tennessee |
California | Kentucky | New Jersey | Texas |
Colorado | Louisiana | New Mexico | Utah |
Connecticut | Maine | New York | Vermont |
Delaware | Maryland | North Carolina | Virginia |
Florida | Massachusetts | North Dakota | Washington |
Georgia | Michigan | Ohio | West Virginia |
Hawaii | Minnesota | Oklahoma | Wisconsin |
Idaho | Mississippi | Oregon | Wyoming |
Linguistic Mirroring
Linguistic mirroring in litigation involves adapting arguments to match those preferred by a judge, enhancing a litigator's persuasiveness. This technique, focusing on aligning communication styles with the judge's preferences, can significantly improve the effectiveness of courtroom arguments, as demonstrated by academic research published in HBR & academic journals.